Back in June we looked at the ill-fated ARS issue by Jefferson County, Alabama -
Between 2002 and 2004, the governing County Commission issued $3.2 billion in floating-rate debt, predominantly in ARS paper but with smaller holdings in variable-rate demand notes (VRDNs)...
Jefferson overlaid these floating positions with a series of interest rate swaps worth $5.4 billion. These contracts paid the County a percentage of one-month Libor and were aimed at synthetically fixing its interest rate payments - a strategy known as variable-rate-swapped-to-fixed-rate. But with the municipality having to pay huge penalty fees on outstanding ARS paper - the result of failed auctions and multiple downgrades - these hedges proved woefully inadequate, leaving the County facing hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.
CR now points to this BusinessWeek article, which suggests that the end is nigh:
Running out of options after months of talks with bondholders and insurers, Jefferson County commissioners voted earlier this week to let the governor negotiate directly with creditors. They canceled plans for a public referendum set for Nov. 4 on whether to file for bankruptcy. A decision not to make the interest payment would place the county in default and put it one step closer to filing bankruptcy over a $3.2 billion bill...
The county has a month's grace to renegotiate - then the hammer comes down.
This NYT article looks at the bigger problem of poor disclosure in the muni market. But it doesn't mention the fact that muni bonds have been historically underrated by the CRAs compared to corporate bonds.


Subscribe to this blog's feed

Comments (1)
I suspect there are many counties/municipalities that are either going through this exact dilemma are will be soon. Mis-managing money seems to be a a common theme these days.
Posted by Crimson State Property watcher | September 2, 2008 8:48 PM
Posted on September 2, 2008 20:48